独立量刑程序模式下的证明制度

量刑作为刑事审判活动的一个重要组成部分,既是司法审判的落脚点,也是衡量司法公正与否的重要因素。近年来,量刑环节出现的种种弊端迫切要求量刑程序独立于定罪程序之外,对其进行严格的规制。与此相适应,必须设立一种不同于定罪证明制度的量刑证明制度,以求使量刑结果更为公正合理。以独立量刑程序框架为背景,对量刑程序中的证明制度作探讨。     

论以市县一体化体制推进南通沿海开发

沿海开发是规模巨大的现代化工程,它不仅能产生巨大的经济能量,而且也能对现有体制产生巨大的冲击。只有不断改革和创新体制,才能为沿海开发战略提供强大的动力和制度保障。阐明了沿海开发对体制改革的要求,着重从行政体制改革的角度,提出了构建市县一体化体制推进南通沿海开发的设想。     

区域政府合作:武陵民族地区行政管理体制创新构想

创新行政管理体制,实质上体现为一种制度安排和设计.本文以实现区域政府合作为着眼点和切入点,围绕主体、机制、模式、规范等行政管理体制基本构成要素,在深入解读区域政府合作内涵的基础上,提出了创新武陵民族地区行政管理体制的初步构想.     

On robustness of the Shiryaev–Roberts change-point detection procedure under parameter misspecification in the post-change distribution

The gist of the quickest change-point detection problem is to detect the presence of a change in the statistical behavior of a series of sequentially made observations, and do so in an optimal detection-speed-versus-“false-positive”-risk manner. When optimality is understood either in the generalized Bayesian sense or as defined in Shiryaev's multi-cyclic setup, the so-called Shiryaev–Roberts (SR) detection procedure is known to be the “best one can do”, provided, however, that the observations’ pre- and post-change distributions are both fully specified. We consider a more realistic setup, viz. one where the post-change distribution is assumed known only up to a parameter, so that the latter may be misspecified. The question of interest is the sensitivity (or robustness) of the otherwise “best” SR procedure with respect to a possible misspecification of the post-change distribution parameter. To answer this question, we provide a case study where, in a specific Gaussian scenario, we allow the SR procedure to be “out of tune” in the way of the post-change distribution parameter, and numerically assess the effect of the “mistuning” on Shiryaev's (multi-cyclic) Stationary Average Detection Delay delivered by the SR procedure. The comprehensive quantitative robustness characterization of the SR procedure obtained in the study can be used to develop the respective theory as well as to provide a rational for practical design of the SR procedure. The overall qualitative conclusion of the study is an expected one: the SR procedure is less (more) robust for less (more) contrast changes and for lower (higher) levels of the false alarm risk.     

Compter : l’invention de la statistique des fonctionnaires en France (1890-1930)

Civil servant statistics in France were invented on the margins of the state during the period from 1890 to 1930. This invention came out of activist and/or professional rationales that were desynchronized with the drafting or application of polices for reducing the number of government employees. There were three successive phases. At the dawn of the xx^th century, civil servants were counted in order to inveigh against “functionarism” and “depopulation”. During the decade before World War I, counting them was a matter of improving the expertise of statisticians. Between the two World Wars, sharp cuts were made in personnel, while civil service statistics were held in abeyance. By focusing on how civil servant statistics have been produced and used, the approach proposed herein sheds new light on a persistent but paradoxical discourse in France that ignores how many civil servants there are while claiming that there are too many.     

民事再审程序修改如何体现程序正义

《民事诉讼法》修改前再审程序存在缺陷，修改后更加强调程序正当性的重要性，如强调了质证的程序价值，管辖法院和审判主体的合法性与结果正当化之间的关系以及当事人的程序参与权与程序正当化之间的内在关系，尤其是当事人对诉讼的参与权和辩论权。     

会计委派制的界限——来自企业理论的解释

应用企业的有关原理来分析当前会计界争议的热点问题——会计委派制。在批驳会计委派制的间接委派可行性的基础上 ,进一步论证了会计委派制适用界限 :会计委派制不适用于企业 ;但它适用于行政事业单位     

内容出自形式吗——略评哈贝马斯的“对话伦理学”

近代西方"内容出自形式"神话的构建历史,可从康德"绝对命令"开始,直到罗尔斯的"社会契约"论和哈贝马斯的"对话伦理学"。哈氏"对话伦理学"的纯粹形式倾向,体现在"交往的不可避免性,论证性原则,最后根据的问题"等三项基本要义之中。"形式不可能产生内容",因而对哈氏神话必须进行反思和批判,基于经验、内容及人的法权,尝试构建实体论证的程序正义论。     

对我国土地行政管理体制的思考

目前中国正处在经济高速发展、城市化和工业化突飞猛进的时期，非农用地的需求不可避免将进一步增长。不仅国家粮食安全、生态安全、保证建设用地需求与耕地有关，其他一系列社会问题也在耕地转移的过程中反映出来。面对诸如此类的问题．土地行政管理如不能统筹各种关系，就会陷入顾此失彼的境地，一切症结也正在于此。这里主要谈一下“统筹城乡协调发展”和“统筹一要吃饭，二要建设”两个关键问题。     

运动式执法与中国治理的困境

从决策议程对环境的回应、动员社会中的稀缺资源和实现政府间合作三个角度来分析运动式执法的必然性，运动式执法作为一种政策工具和治理模式并非总是消极的。一味地否定运动式执法，既不符合中国公共治理的现实需要，也不符合严肃的学术研究的要求。